AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs Intel Arc A770M

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT on Amazon USA
Intel Arc A770M on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT on one side and Intel Arc A770M on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 4608 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.3 GHz, its lithography is 7 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, with 512 execution units, it includes 4096 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.7 GHz, its lithography is 6 nm TSMC N6. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT Intel Arc A770M
Market (main) Desktop Desktop
Release date Q4 2020 Q4 2022
Model number 215-121000177,
Navi 21 XT
GPU name Navi 21 DG2-512
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Xe HPG
Generation Navi II RX 6000 Alchemist Arc 7 Mobile
Lithography 7 nm 6 nm TSMC N6
Transistors 26,800,000,000 21,700,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
GPU base clock 1,825 MHz 1,650 MHz
GPU boost clock 2,250 MHz 1,650 MHz
Memory frequency 2,000 MHz 2,000 MHz
Effective memory speed 16 Gbps 16 Gbps
Memory size 16 GB 16 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory bus 256 bit 256 bit
Memory bandwidth 512.0 GB/s 512.0 GB/s
TDP 300 W 120 W
Multicard technology - -
Max display resolution

7680 × 4320@60Hz (DP),
3840 x 2160@144Hz (DP),
7680 × 4320@60Hz (HDMI),
3840 x 2160@120Hz (HDMI)

4096 x 2160@60Hz (HDMI),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),
5120 x 2880@60Hz (eDP)
Video decoding H.265, HEVC, H.264 4K H.264, H.265, HEVC, AV1, VP9
Video encoding H.265, HEVC, H.264 4K H.264, H.265, HEVC, AV1
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 72 32
Execution units - 512
Shading units 4,608 4,096
TMUs 288 256
ROPs 128 128
RT cores 72 32
Cache memory 128 MB 16 MB
Pixel fillrate 288.0 GP/s 211.2 GP/s
Texture fillrate 648.0 GT/s 422.4 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half) 41.5 TFLOPS 27.0 TFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float) 20.7 TFLOPS 13.5 TFLOPS

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 20,740
Intel Arc A770M 13,517

The difference is 53%.

Single-precision floating-point format, also called FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point. FP32 power helps assess the video card's capabilities for generating rendering workloads. Video games use INT32 and FP32 cores to manage calculations with integers and numbers with decimals in order to produce maps, bone matrices on which the vertex shaders will calculate the vertices. Values in single precision format are mainly used in video games and 3D software.

See also:

Intel Arc A770 16GBIntel Arc A770 8GBIntel Arc A770 Limited Edition 16GB


AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT Nvidia EquivalentIntel Arc A770M Nvidia EquivalentIntel Arc A770M AMD Equivalent © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.