AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 8GB

AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT on Amazon USA
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 8GB on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT on one side and Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 8GB on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 1024 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.8 GHz, its lithography is 6 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 2560 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.8 GHz, its lithography is 8 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Market (main) Desktop Desktop
Release date Q1 2022 Q1 2022
Model number 215-135000006,
Navi 24 XT
GPU name Navi 24 GA106
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Ampere
Generation Navi II RX 6000 GeForce 30
Lithography 6 nm 8 nm
Transistors 5,400,000,000 12,000,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x8
GPU base clock 2,310 MHz 1,552 MHz
GPU boost clock 2,815 MHz 1,777 MHz
Memory frequency 2,248 MHz 1,750 MHz
Effective memory speed 18 Gbps 14 Gbps
Memory size 4 GB 8 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory bus 64 bit 128 bit
Memory bandwidth 143.9 GB/s 224.0 GB/s
TDP 107 W 130 W
Suggested PSU300W ATX Power Supply 400W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology - -

1x DisplayPort

3x DisplayPort
Max display resolution

7680 × 4320@60Hz (DP),
3840 x 2160@144Hz (DP),
7680 × 4320@60Hz (HDMI),
3840 x 2160@120Hz (HDMI)

7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),
3840 x 2160@240Hz (DP),
7680 x 4320@120Hz (2x DP),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (HDMI)
Video decoding H.265, HEVC, H.264 4K -
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 16 20
Shading units (cuda cores) 1,024 2,560
TMUs 64 80
ROPs 32 32
RT cores 16 20
Cache memory 16 MB 2 MB
Pixel fillrate 90.1 GP/s 56.9 GP/s
Texture fillrate 180.2 GT/s 142.2 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half) 11.5 TFLOPS 9.1 TFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float) 5.8 TFLOPS 9.1 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double) 360.3 GFLOPS 142.2 GFLOPS

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 8GB 9,098
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT 5,765

The difference is 58%.

Single-precision floating-point format, also called FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point. FP32 power helps assess the video card's capabilities for generating rendering workloads. Video games use INT32 and FP32 cores to manage calculations with integers and numbers with decimals in order to produce maps, bone matrices on which the vertex shaders will calculate the vertices. Values in single precision format are mainly used in video games and 3D software.


AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT Nvidia EquivalentNvidia GeForce RTX 3050 8GB AMD Equivalent © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.