AMD Radeon R9 290X vs Sony PlayStation 4 Slim GPU

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon R9 290X on one side and Sony PlayStation 4 Slim GPU on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 2816 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.0 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the console segment, with 1152 execution units, it includes 72 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0.8 GHz, its lithography is 16 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card		AMD Radeon R9 290X				Sony PlayStation 4 Slim GPU
Market (main)		Desktop				Console
Release date		Q4 2013				Q3 2016
Model number		215-0852000, Hawaii XT				CXD90043GB, PS4 Slim GPU
GPU name		Hawaii				Liverpool 16 nm
Architecture		GCN 2.0				GCN 2.0
Generation		Volcanic Islands R9 200				Sony Console GPU
Lithography		28 nm				16 nm
Bus interface		PCIe 3.0 x16				SoC
GPU base clock		1,000 MHz				800 MHz
GPU boost clock		1,000 MHz				800 MHz
Memory frequency		1,250 MHz				1,375 MHz
Effective memory speed		5 Gbps				5.5 Gbps
Memory size		4 GB				8 GB
Memory type		GDDR5				GDDR5
Memory bus		512 bit				256 bit
Memory bandwidth		320.0 GB/s				176.0 GB/s
TDP		290 W				75 W
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)		44				-
Execution units		-				1,152
Shading units		2,816				72
TMUs		176				32
ROPs		64				18
Cache memory		1 MB				-
Pixel fillrate		64.0 GP/s				25.6 GP/s
Texture fillrate		176.0 GT/s				57.6 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float)		5.6 TFLOPS				1.8 TFLOPS
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

	FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
AMD Radeon R9 290X	5,632
Sony PlayStation 4 Slim GPU	1,843

The difference is 206%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

AMD Radeon R9 290AMD Radeon R9 290X2

Equivalence:

AMD Radeon R9 290X Nvidia equivalentSony PlayStation 4 Slim GPU Nvidia equivalentSony PlayStation 4 Slim GPU AMD equivalent

GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland