AMD Radeon R9 290X vs Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6700 XT

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon R9 290X on one side and Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6700 XT on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 2816 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.0 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 2560 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.6 GHz, its lithography is 7 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card		AMD Radeon R9 290X				Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6700 XT
Market (main)		Desktop				Desktop
Release date		Q4 2013				Q1 2021
Model number		215-0852000, Hawaii XT				Navi 22 XT 215-127000006, 11306-02-20G
GPU name		Hawaii				Navi 22
Architecture		GCN 2.0				RDNA 2.0
Generation		Volcanic Islands R9 200				Navi II RX 6000
Lithography		28 nm				7 nm
Transistors		6,200,000,000				17,200,000,000
Bus interface		PCIe 3.0 x16				PCIe 4.0 x16
GPU base clock		1,000 MHz				2,321 MHz
GPU boost clock		1,000 MHz				2,581 MHz
Memory frequency		1,250 MHz				2,000 MHz
Effective memory speed		5 Gbps				16 Gbps
Memory size		4 GB				12 GB
Memory type		GDDR5				GDDR6
Memory bus		512 bit				192 bit
Memory bandwidth		320.0 GB/s				384.0 GB/s
TDP		290 W				230 W
Suggested PSU		600W ATX Power Supply				600W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology		-				-
Outputs		2x DVI 1x HDMI 1x DisplayPort				1x HDMI 3x DisplayPort
Max display resolution		-				7680 × 4320@60Hz (DP), 3840 x 2160@144Hz (DP), 7680 × 4320@60Hz (HDMI), 3840 x 2160@120Hz (HDMI)
Video decoding		-				H.265, HEVC, H.264 4K
Video encoding		-				H.265, HEVC, H.264 4K
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)		44				40
Shading units		2,816				2,560
TMUs		176				160
ROPs		64				64
Cache memory		1 MB				96 MB
Pixel fillrate		64.0 GP/s				165.2 GP/s
Texture fillrate		176.0 GT/s				413.0 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float)		5.6 TFLOPS				13.2 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)		704 GFLOPS				825.9 GFLOPS
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6700 XT	13,215
AMD Radeon R9 290X	5,632

The difference is 135%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

AMD Radeon R9 290AMD Radeon R9 290X2

Equivalence:

AMD Radeon R9 290X Nvidia equivalentSapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6700 XT Nvidia equivalent

GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland