AMD Radeon R9 290X vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 TU104

AMD Radeon R9 290X on Amazon USA
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon R9 290X on one side and Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 2816 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.0 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 1920 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.7 GHz, its lithography is 12 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card AMD Radeon R9 290X Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
Market (main) Desktop Desktop
Release date Q4 2013 Q1 2020
Model number 215-0852000, Hawaii XT TU104-150-KC-A1
GPU name Hawaii TU106
Architecture GCN 2.0 Turing
Generation Volcanic Islands R9 200 GeForce 20
Lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Transistors 6,200,000,000 13,600,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock 1,000 MHz 1,365 MHz
GPU boost clock 1,000 MHz 1,680 MHz
Memory frequency 1,250 MHz 1,750 MHz
Effective memory speed 5 Gbps 14 Gbps
Memory size 4 GB 6 GB
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR6
Memory bus 512 bit 192 bit
Memory bandwidth 320.0 GB/s 336.0 GB/s
TDP 290 W 160 W
Suggested PSU600W ATX Power Supply 500W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology - -

2x DVI
1x DisplayPort

1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x USB Type-C
Max display resolution


4096 x 2160@60Hz (HDMI),
4096 x 2160@144Hz (DP),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP)
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 44 30
Shading units (cuda cores) 2,816 1,920
TMUs 176 120
ROPs 64 48
Cache memory 1 MB 3 MB
Pixel fillrate 64.0 GP/s 80.6 GP/s
Texture fillrate 176.0 GT/s 201.6 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float) 5.6 TFLOPS 6.5 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double) 704 GFLOPS 201.6 GFLOPS

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 6,451
AMD Radeon R9 290X 5,632

The difference is 15%.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

AMD Radeon R9 290AMD Radeon R9 290X2


AMD Radeon R9 290X Nvidia equivalentNvidia GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 AMD equivalent © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland