AMD Radeon R9 290X vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M

AMD Radeon R9 290X on Amazon USA
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon R9 290X on one side and Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 2816 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.0 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the laptop segment, it includes 1536 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0.8 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card AMD Radeon R9 290X Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M
Market (main) Desktop Laptop
Release date Q4 2013 Q2 2013
Model number 215-0852000, Hawaii XT N14E-GTX-A2
GPU name Hawaii GK104
Architecture GCN 2.0 Kepler
Generation Volcanic Islands R9 200 GeForce 700M
Lithography 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors 6,200,000,000 3,540,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
GPU base clock 1,000 MHz 771 MHz
GPU boost clock 1,000 MHz 797 MHz
Memory frequency 1,250 MHz 1,250 MHz
Effective memory speed 5 Gbps 5 Gbps
Memory size 4 GB 4 GB
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Memory bus 512 bit 256 bit
Memory bandwidth 320.0 GB/s 160.0 GB/s
TDP 290 W 122 W
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 44 8
Shading units (cuda cores) 2,816 1,536
TMUs 176 128
ROPs 64 32
Cache memory 1 MB 512 KB
Pixel fillrate 64.0 GP/s 25.5 GP/s
Texture fillrate 176.0 GT/s 102.0 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float) 5.6 TFLOPS 2.4 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double) 704 GFLOPS 102 GFLOPS

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
AMD Radeon R9 290X 5,632
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M 2,448

The difference is 130%.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

AMD Radeon R9 290AMD Radeon R9 290X2

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti


AMD Radeon R9 290X Nvidia equivalentNvidia GeForce GTX 780M AMD equivalent © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland