AMD Radeon R9 290X vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon R9 290X on one side and Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 2816 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.0 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the laptop segment, it includes 768 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0.9 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card		AMD Radeon R9 290X				Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M
Market (main)		Desktop				Laptop
Release date		Q4 2013				Q2 2013
Model number		215-0852000, Hawaii XT				N14E-GE-B-A1
GPU name		Hawaii				GK106
Architecture		GCN 2.0				Kepler
Generation		Volcanic Islands R9 200				GeForce 700M
Lithography		28 nm				28 nm
Transistors		6,200,000,000				2,540,000,000
Bus interface		PCIe 3.0 x16				MXM-B (3.0)
GPU base clock		1,000 MHz				797 MHz
GPU boost clock		1,000 MHz				863 MHz
Memory frequency		1,250 MHz				1,002 MHz
Effective memory speed		5 Gbps				4 Gbps
Memory size		4 GB				2 GB
Memory type		GDDR5				GDDR5
Memory bus		512 bit				128 bit
Memory bandwidth		320.0 GB/s				64.1 GB/s
TDP		290 W				75 W
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)		44				4
Shading units (cuda cores)		2,816				768
TMUs		176				64
ROPs		64				16
Cache memory		1 MB				256 KB
Pixel fillrate		64.0 GP/s				13.8 GP/s
Texture fillrate		176.0 GT/s				55.2 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float)		5.6 TFLOPS				1.3 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)		704 GFLOPS				55.2 GFLOPS
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
AMD Radeon R9 290X	5,632
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M	1,326

The difference is 325%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

AMD Radeon R9 290AMD Radeon R9 290X2

Equivalence:

AMD Radeon R9 290X Nvidia equivalentNvidia GeForce GTX 765M AMD equivalent

GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland