AMD Radeon R9 290X vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon R9 290X on one side and Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 2816 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.0 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the laptop segment, with 80 execution units, it includes 640 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.3 GHz, its lithography is 10 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card		AMD Radeon R9 290X				Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
Market (main)		Desktop				Laptop
Release date		Q4 2013				Q1 2022
Model number		215-0852000, Hawaii XT				-
GPU name		Hawaii				Alder Lake GT1
Architecture		GCN 2.0				Generation 12.2
Generation		Volcanic Islands R9 200				HD Graphics-M Alder Lake
Lithography		28 nm				10 nm
Bus interface		PCIe 3.0 x16				Ring Bus
GPU base clock		1,000 MHz				300 MHz
GPU boost clock		1,000 MHz				1,300 MHz
TDP		290 W				45 W
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)		44				-
Execution units		-				80
Shading units		2,816				640
TMUs		176				40
ROPs		64				20
Cache memory		1 MB				12 MB
Pixel fillrate		64.0 GP/s				26.0 GP/s
Texture fillrate		176.0 GT/s				52.0 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float)		5.6 TFLOPS				1.7 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)		704 GFLOPS				416 GFLOPS
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

	FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
AMD Radeon R9 290X	5,632
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)	1,664

The difference is 238%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

AMD Radeon R9 290AMD Radeon R9 290X2

Processors with the graphics card Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake):

Intel Core i5-1230UIntel Core i5-1235UIntel Core i5-1240PIntel Core i5-1240UIntel Core i5-1245UIntel Core i5-1245UEIntel Core i5-12500HIntel Core i5-1250PIntel Core i5-1250PEIntel Core i5-12600HIntel Core i5-13500HIntel Core i5-13505H

Equivalence:

AMD Radeon R9 290X Nvidia equivalentIntel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) Nvidia equivalentIntel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) AMD equivalent

GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland