AMD Radeon R7 360 vs XFX Speedster QICK 210 RX 6500 XT Core

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon R7 360 on one side and XFX Speedster QICK 210 RX 6500 XT Core on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 768 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.1 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 1024 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.8 GHz, its lithography is 6 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card		AMD Radeon R7 360				XFX Speedster QICK 210 RX 6500 XT Core
Market (main)		Desktop				Desktop
Release date		Q2 2015				Q1 2022
Model number		215-0875010, Tobago PRO				Navi 24 XT 215-135000006, RX-65XT4DBDQ
GPU name		Tobago				Navi 24
Architecture		GCN 1.0				RDNA 2.0
Generation		Pirate Islands R7 300				Navi II RX 6000
Lithography		28 nm				6 nm
Transistors		2,080,000,000				5,400,000,000
Bus interface		PCIe 3.0 x16				PCIe 4.0 x4
GPU base clock		1,000 MHz				2,420 MHz
GPU boost clock		1,050 MHz				2,825 MHz
Memory frequency		1,500 MHz				2,248 MHz
Effective memory speed		6 Gbps				18 Gbps
Memory size		2 GB				4 GB
Memory type		GDDR5				GDDR6
Memory bus		128 bit				64 bit
Memory bandwidth		96.0 GB/s				143.9 GB/s
TDP		100 W				107 W
Suggested PSU		300W ATX Power Supply				300W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology		-				-
Outputs		1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x DisplayPort				1x HDMI 1x DisplayPort
Max display resolution		-				7680 × 4320@60Hz (DP), 3840 x 2160@144Hz (DP), 7680 × 4320@60Hz (HDMI), 3840 x 2160@120Hz (HDMI)
Video decoding		-				H.265, HEVC, H.264 4K
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)		12				16
Shading units		768				1,024
TMUs		48				64
ROPs		16				32
Cache memory		256 KB				16 MB
Pixel fillrate		16.8 GP/s				90.4 GP/s
Texture fillrate		50.4 GT/s				180.8 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float)		1.6 TFLOPS				5.8 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)		100.8 GFLOPS				361.6 GFLOPS
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

	FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
XFX Speedster QICK 210 RX 6500 XT Core	5,785.6
AMD Radeon R7 360	1,613

The difference is 259%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

AMD Radeon R7 360E

Equivalence:

AMD Radeon R7 360 Nvidia equivalentXFX Speedster QICK 210 RX 6500 XT Core Nvidia equivalentXFX Speedster QICK 210 RX 6500 XT Core AMD equivalent

GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland