AMD Radeon R7 360 vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 16GB

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon R7 360 on one side and Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 16GB on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 768 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.1 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 9728 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.5 GHz, its lithography is 4 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card		AMD Radeon R7 360				Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 16GB
Market (main)		Desktop				Desktop
Release date		Q2 2015				Q4 2022
Model number		215-0875010, Tobago PRO				AD103-300-A1
GPU name		Tobago				AD103
Architecture		GCN 1.0				Ada Lovelace
Generation		Pirate Islands R7 300				GeForce 40
Lithography		28 nm				4 nm
Transistors		2,080,000,000				45,900,000,000
Bus interface		PCIe 3.0 x16				PCIe 4.0 x16
GPU base clock		1,000 MHz				2,205 MHz
GPU boost clock		1,050 MHz				2,505 MHz
Memory frequency		1,500 MHz				1,400 MHz
Effective memory speed		6 Gbps				22.4 Gbps
Memory size		2 GB				16 GB
Memory type		GDDR5				GDDR6X
Memory bus		128 bit				256 bit
Memory bandwidth		96.0 GB/s				716.8 GB/s
TDP		100 W				320 W
Suggested PSU		300W ATX Power Supply				750W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology		-				-
Outputs		1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x DisplayPort				1x HDMI 3x DisplayPort
Max display resolution		-				3840 × 2160@240Hz (DP), 7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP), 7680 x 4320@120Hz (2x DP), 7680 x 4320@60Hz (HDMI)
Video decoding		-				H.264, AV1, HEVC
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)		12				76
Shading units (cuda cores)		768				9,728
TMUs		48				304
ROPs		16				112
Cache memory		256 KB				64 MB
Pixel fillrate		16.8 GP/s				280.6 GP/s
Texture fillrate		50.4 GT/s				761.5 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float)		1.6 TFLOPS				48.7 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)		100.8 GFLOPS				761.5 GFLOPS
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 16GB	48,740
AMD Radeon R7 360	1,613

The difference is 2922%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

AMD Radeon R7 360E

Equivalence:

AMD Radeon R7 360 Nvidia equivalentNvidia GeForce RTX 4080 16GB AMD equivalent

GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland