AMD Radeon R7 360 vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 16GB

AMD Radeon R7 360 on Amazon USA
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 16GB on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon R7 360 on one side and Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 16GB on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 768 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.1 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 9728 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.5 GHz, its lithography is 4 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card AMD Radeon R7 360 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 16GB
Market (main) Desktop Desktop
Release date Q2 2015 Q4 2022
Model number 215-0875010, Tobago PRO AD103-300-A1
GPU name Tobago AD103
Architecture GCN 1.0 Ada Lovelace
Generation Pirate Islands R7 300 GeForce 40
Lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Transistors 2,080,000,000 45,900,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
GPU base clock 1,000 MHz 2,205 MHz
GPU boost clock 1,050 MHz 2,505 MHz
Memory frequency 1,500 MHz 1,400 MHz
Effective memory speed 6 Gbps 22.4 Gbps
Memory size 2 GB 16 GB
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR6X
Memory bus 128 bit 256 bit
Memory bandwidth 96.0 GB/s 716.8 GB/s
TDP 100 W 320 W
Suggested PSU300W ATX Power Supply 750W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology - -

1x DVI
1x DisplayPort

3x DisplayPort
Max display resolution


3840 × 2160@240Hz (DP),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),
7680 x 4320@120Hz (2x DP),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (HDMI)
Video decoding - H.264, AV1, HEVC
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 12 76
Shading units (cuda cores) 768 9,728
TMUs 48 304
ROPs 16 112
Cache memory 256 KB 64 MB
Pixel fillrate 16.8 GP/s 280.6 GP/s
Texture fillrate 50.4 GT/s 761.5 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float) 1.6 TFLOPS 48.7 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double) 100.8 GFLOPS 761.5 GFLOPS

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 16GB 48,740
AMD Radeon R7 360 1,613

The difference is 2922%.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

AMD Radeon R7 360E


AMD Radeon R7 360 Nvidia equivalentNvidia GeForce RTX 4080 16GB AMD equivalent © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland