AMD Radeon R7 360 vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q


AMD Radeon R7 360 on Amazon USA
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon R7 360 on one side and Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 768 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.1 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the laptop segment, it includes 5888 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.0 GHz, its lithography is 8 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.







Specification comparison:


Graphics card AMD Radeon R7 360 Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q
Market (main) Desktop Laptop
Release date Q2 2015 Q1 2022
Model number 215-0875010,
Tobago PRO
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q
GPU name Tobago GA104
Architecture GCN 1.0 Ampere
Generation Pirate Islands R7 300 GeForce 30 Mobile
Lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Transistors 2,080,000,000 17,400,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
GPU base clock 1,000 MHz 510 MHz
GPU boost clock 1,050 MHz 1,035 MHz
Memory frequency 1,500 MHz 1,500 MHz
Effective memory speed 6 Gbps 12 Gbps
Memory size 2 GB 8 GB
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR6
Memory bus 128 bit 256 bit
Memory bandwidth 96.0 GB/s 384.0 GB/s
TDP 100 W 80 W
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 12 46
Shading units (cuda cores) 768 5,888
TMUs 48 184
ROPs 16 96
Cache memory 256 KB 4 MB
Pixel fillrate 16.8 GP/s 99.4 GP/s
Texture fillrate 50.4 GT/s 190.4 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float) 1.6 TFLOPS 12.2 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double) 100.8 GFLOPS 190.4 GFLOPS
Amazon
eBay






Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.


Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.


FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q 12,188
AMD Radeon R7 360 1,613


The difference is 656%.


Single-precision floating-point format, also called FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point. FP32 power helps assess the video card's capabilities for generating rendering workloads. Video games use INT32 and FP32 cores to manage calculations with integers and numbers with decimals in order to produce maps, bone matrices on which the vertex shaders will calculate the vertices. Values in single precision format are mainly used in video games and 3D software.


See also:

AMD Radeon R7 360E

Equivalence:

AMD Radeon R7 360 Nvidia EquivalentNvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q AMD Equivalent




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.