AMD Radeon R7 360 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon R7 360 on one side and Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 768 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.1 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the laptop segment, with 96 execution units, it includes 768 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.1 GHz, its lithography is 10 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card		AMD Radeon R7 360				Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Market (main)		Desktop				Laptop
Release date		Q2 2015				Q3 2020
Model number		215-0875010, Tobago PRO				-
GPU name		Tobago				Tiger Lake GT2
Architecture		GCN 1.0				Generation 12.0
Generation		Pirate Islands R7 300				Tiger Lake
Lithography		28 nm				10 nm
Bus interface		PCIe 3.0 x16				PCIe 3.0 x1
GPU base clock		1,000 MHz				300 MHz
GPU boost clock		1,050 MHz				1,100 MHz
TDP		100 W				15 W
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)		12				-
Execution units		-				96
Shading units		768				768
TMUs		48				96
ROPs		16				24
Cache memory		256 KB				3.8 MB
Pixel fillrate		16.8 GP/s				26.4 GP/s
Texture fillrate		50.4 GT/s				105.6 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float)		1.6 TFLOPS				1.7 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)		100.8 GFLOPS				422.4 GFLOPS
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU	1,690
AMD Radeon R7 360	1,613

The difference is 5%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

AMD Radeon R7 360E

Processors with the graphics card Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU:

Intel Core i5-1130G7Intel Core i5-11320HIntel Core i5-1135G7Intel Core i7-11370HIntel Core i7-11375HIntel Core i7-11390HIntel Core i7-1160G7Intel Core i7-1165G7Intel Core i7-1180G7Intel Core i7-1185G7Intel Core i7-1185G7EIntel Core i7-1185GREIntel Core i7-1195G7Intel Core i7-1270PIntel Core i7-1280PIntel Core i9-12900HIntel Core i9-12900HK

Equivalence:

AMD Radeon R7 360 Nvidia equivalentIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Nvidia equivalentIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU AMD equivalent

GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland