AMD Radeon R7 360 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

AMD Radeon R7 360 on Amazon USA
Intel Arctic Sound-M on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon R7 360 on one side and Intel Arctic Sound-M on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 768 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.1 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the server segment, with 512 execution units, it includes 8192 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0.9 GHz, its lithography is 6 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card AMD Radeon R7 360 Intel Arctic Sound-M
Market (main) Desktop Server
Release date Q2 2015 Q4 2022
Model number 215-0875010, Tobago PRO -
GPU name Tobago Arctic Sound
Architecture GCN 1.0 Generation 12.7
Generation Pirate Islands R7 300 Xe Graphics
Lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Transistors 2,080,000,000 21,700,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
GPU base clock 1,000 MHz 900 MHz
GPU boost clock 1,050 MHz 900 MHz
Memory frequency 1,500 MHz 1,200 MHz
Effective memory speed 6 Gbps 2.4 Gbps
Memory size 2 GB 16 GB
Memory type GDDR5 HBM2e
Memory bus 128 bit 4096 bit
Memory bandwidth 96.0 GB/s 1,229.0 GB/s
TDP 100 W 500 W
Suggested PSU300W ATX Power Supply 950W ATX Power Supply
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 12 -
Execution units - 512
Shading units 768 8,192
TMUs 48 256
ROPs 16 128
Cache memory 256 KB 8 MB
Pixel fillrate 16.8 GP/s 115.2 GP/s
Texture fillrate 50.4 GT/s 230.4 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float) 1.6 TFLOPS 14.8 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double) 100.8 GFLOPS 3.7 TFLOPS

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound-M 14,750
AMD Radeon R7 360 1,613

The difference is 814%.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

AMD Radeon R7 360E


AMD Radeon R7 360 Nvidia equivalentIntel Arctic Sound-M Nvidia equivalentIntel Arctic Sound-M AMD equivalent © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland