AMD Radeon R7 360 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon R7 360 on one side and Intel Arctic Sound-M on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 768 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.1 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the server segment, with 512 execution units, it includes 8192 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0.9 GHz, its lithography is 6 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card		AMD Radeon R7 360				Intel Arctic Sound-M
Market (main)		Desktop				Server
Release date		Q2 2015				Q4 2022
Model number		215-0875010, Tobago PRO				-
GPU name		Tobago				Arctic Sound
Architecture		GCN 1.0				Generation 12.7
Generation		Pirate Islands R7 300				Xe Graphics
Lithography		28 nm				6 nm
Transistors		2,080,000,000				21,700,000,000
Bus interface		PCIe 3.0 x16				PCIe 4.0 x16
GPU base clock		1,000 MHz				900 MHz
GPU boost clock		1,050 MHz				900 MHz
Memory frequency		1,500 MHz				1,200 MHz
Effective memory speed		6 Gbps				2.4 Gbps
Memory size		2 GB				16 GB
Memory type		GDDR5				HBM2e
Memory bus		128 bit				4096 bit
Memory bandwidth		96.0 GB/s				1,229.0 GB/s
TDP		100 W				500 W
Suggested PSU		300W ATX Power Supply				950W ATX Power Supply
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)		12				-
Execution units		-				512
Shading units		768				8,192
TMUs		48				256
ROPs		16				128
Cache memory		256 KB				8 MB
Pixel fillrate		16.8 GP/s				115.2 GP/s
Texture fillrate		50.4 GT/s				230.4 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float)		1.6 TFLOPS				14.8 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)		100.8 GFLOPS				3.7 TFLOPS
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound-M	14,750
AMD Radeon R7 360	1,613

The difference is 814%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

AMD Radeon R7 360E

Equivalence:

AMD Radeon R7 360 Nvidia equivalentIntel Arctic Sound-M Nvidia equivalentIntel Arctic Sound-M AMD equivalent

GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland