FR- Home page
-
Graphics card - Comparison
AMD Radeon R7 360 vs ARM Mali-T720 MP1
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon R7 360 on one side and ARM Mali-T720 MP1 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 768 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.1 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the smartphone segment, with 1 execution unit, it includes 16 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0.6 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm HPM. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in various benchmarks.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Graphics card | AMD Radeon R7 360 | ARM Mali-T720 MP1 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Smartphone | ||||||
| Release date | Q2 2015 | Q4 2013 | ||||||
| Model number | 215-0875010, Tobago PRO | - | ||||||
| GPU name | Tobago | Mali-T720 | ||||||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Midgard | ||||||
| Generation | Pirate Islands R7 300 | - | ||||||
| Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm HPM | ||||||
| Bus interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 1,000 MHz | - | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1,050 MHz | 600 MHz | ||||||
| TDP | 100 W | - | ||||||
| Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) | 12 | - | ||||||
| Execution units | - | 1 | ||||||
| Shading units | 768 | 16 | ||||||
| TMUs | 48 | - | ||||||
| ROPs | 16 | - | ||||||
| Cache memory | 256 KB | 32 KB | ||||||
| Pixel fillrate | 16.8 GP/s | 0.7 GP/s | ||||||
| Performance FP32 (float) | 1.6 TFLOPS | 10.2 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| FP32 Performance in GFLOPS | |
|---|---|
AMD Radeon R7 360 |
1,613 |
| ARM Mali-T720 MP1 |
10.2 |
The difference is 15714%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.
Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.
See also:
AMD Radeon R7 360ESmartphones with the graphics card ARM Mali-T720 MP1:
Blackview A80Doogee X95Infinix Hot 6LG K4Nokia 1Nokia 3Oukitel C22Samsung Galaxy J2Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) ExynosSamsung Galaxy Xcover 4Umidigi A7SProcessors with the graphics card ARM Mali-T720 MP1:
MediaTek MT6735MMediaTek MT6737MMediaTek MT6737VSamsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570Samsung Exynos 9110Equivalence:
AMD Radeon R7 360 Nvidia equivalentARM Mali-T720 MP1 Nvidia equivalentARM Mali-T720 MP1 AMD equivalentDisclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.