AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM Graphics Card Benchmarks and Specs

Specifications of the AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM graphics card dedicated to the desktop sector, with 1280 shading units, its maximum frequency is 0.9GHz The table below makes it possible to observe well the lithography, the number of transistors (if present), the offered cache memory, the quantity of texture mapping units, of render output units, the release date, the GFLOPS performance, the values obtained in the benchmark platforms.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the link above.

Specifications:

Graphics card		AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM
Market (main)		Desktop
Release date		3 2014
Model number		215-0848000, Curacao PRO
GPU name		Curacao
Architecture		GCN 1.0
Generation		Volcanic Islands R7 200
Lithography		28 nm
Transistors		2,800,000,000
Bus interface		PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock		900 MHz
GPU boost clock		925 MHz
Memory frequency		1,400 MHz
Effective memory speed		5.6 Gbps
Memory size		2 GB
Memory type		GDDR5
Memory bus		256 bit
Memory bandwidth		179.2 GB/s
TDP		150 W
Suggested PSU		450W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology		-
Outputs		2x DVI 1x HDMI 1x DisplayPort
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)		20
Shading units		1,280
TMUs		80
ROPs		32
Cache memory		512 KB
Pixel fillrate		29.6 GPixel/s
Texture fillrate		74.0 GTexel/s
Performance FP32 (float)		2.4 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)		148 GFLOPS
Amazon
eBay

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

TMUs: texture mapping units. This unit was a physical processor separated from the main graphics processing units. It is able to distort a bitmap image, and also to resize it, to rotate it and to place it as a texture onto a plane of a specific 3D model.

ROPs: render output units. The other name of this unit is raster operations pipeline. This hadware component is taking pixel and texel information, and processing it through vector and matrix operations. The result will be a depth value or a final pixel. It is able to control antialiasing with the merge of several sample into one pixel.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Performance with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between this graphics card and those of equivalent power, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares and rendering performances.


Pixel fillrate performance comparison for this graphics card:

	Pixel fillrate performance in GPixels/s
Nvidia Quadro M2000	37.22
AMD Radeon PRO 570	35.36
AMD Radeon PRO 575	35.07
AMD Radeon PRO WX 5100	34.75
Intel Arc A310	32
AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM	29.6
Nvidia Quadro M3000 SE	29.57
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1630 EX (1-Click OC)	28.8
Intel UHD Graphics P750	28.8
Kuroutoshikou GeForce GTX 1630	28.56

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

The term pixel fillrate is refering to the number of pixels that the video card is able to generate every second. This performance is achieved by multiplying the raster output units (ROPs) by the clock frequency of the graphics processor unit (GPU).


Texture fillrate performance comparison for this graphics card:

	Texture fillrate performance in GTexels/s
Asus Radeon RX 560 2GB	81.6
Nvidia T1000	78.12
Nvidia T1000 8GB	78.12
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950 (OEM)	76.99
AMD Radeon PRO WX 4100	76.9
AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM	74
Asus ROG Strix GTX 1050 Ti Gaming OC	71.66
EVGA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti FTW Gaming	71.66
Palit GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Dual OC	71.04
EVGA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti SSC Gaming	71.04

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

The term texture fillrate refers to the number of map texture elements (texels) that the GPU is capable of generating per second. This performance is achieved by multiplying the texture mapping units (TMUs) by the clock frequency of the graphics processor unit.


FP32 performance comparison (single precision; float; floating-point 32) for this graphics card:

	FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Asus Radeon RX 560 2GB	2,611
Nvidia T1000	2,500
Nvidia T1000 8GB	2,500
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950 (OEM)	2,464
AMD Radeon PRO WX 4100	2,460
AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM	2,368
Asus ROG Strix GTX 1050 Ti Gaming OC	2,293
EVGA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti FTW Gaming	2,293
Palit GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Dual OC	2,273
EVGA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti SSC Gaming	2,273

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

List of comparisons:

AcerAMDAMD RadeonAMD Radeon GraphicsAMD Radeon HDAMD Radeon HD 6000AMD Radeon HD 7000AMD Radeon HD 7800AMD Radeon HD 8000AMD Radeon InstinctAMD Radeon MobileAMD Radeon PROAMD Radeon PRO MobileAMD Radeon R2AMD Radeon R4AMD Radeon R5AMD Radeon R6AMD Radeon R7AMD Radeon R7 200AMD Radeon R9AMD Radeon R9 200AMD Radeon RXAMD Radeon RX 300AMD Radeon RX 400AMD Radeon RX 500AMD Radeon RX 5000AMD Radeon RX 5000 MobileAMD Radeon RX 6000AMD Radeon RX 6000 MobileAMD Radeon RX 7000AMD Radeon RX VegaAMD Radeon VegaAMD Radeon Vega 11AMD Radeon Vega 3AMD Radeon Vega 6AMD Radeon Vega 8AMD Radeon Vega MobileAppleARMARM MaliARM Mali-400ARM Mali-450ARM Mali-470ARM Mali-G31ARM Mali-G51ARM Mali-G52ARM Mali-G57ARM Mali-G610ARM Mali-G68ARM Mali-G71ARM Mali-G710ARM Mali-G72ARM Mali-G76ARM Mali-G77ARM Mali-G78ARM Mali-T720ARM Mali-T760ARM Mali-T764ARM Mali-T820ARM Mali-T830ARM Mali-T860ARM Mali-T880ASRockASRock Radeon RX 6000AsusAsus GeForce 4000Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2000ATIATI Radeon HDATI Radeon HD 3000ATI Radeon HD 4000ATI Radeon HD 5000BFGBroadcomBroadcom VideoCoreColorfulColorful GeForce 4000DellDMPEVGAEVGA GeForce 1000EVGA GeForce 1600EVGA GeForce 2000EVGA GeForce 3000GainwardGainward GeForce 4000GalaxGigabyteGigabyte GeForce 4000ImaginationImagination PowerVRImagination PowerVR SGX543Imagination PowerVR SGX544Inno3DIntelIntel ArcIntel Arctic SoundIntel HD GraphicsIntel Iris GraphicsIntel Iris Plus GraphicsIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7Intel Iris Xe Graphics MobileIntel UHD GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 610Intel UHD Graphics 620Intel UHD Graphics 630Intel UHD Graphics 730Intel UHD Graphics 770Intel Xe GraphicsKuroutoshikouKuroutoshikou GeForceKuroutoshikou RadeonLeadtekMicrosoftMicrosoft XboxMSIMSI GeForce 3000MSI GeForce 4000NintendoNvidiaNvidia A100Nvidia GeForceNvidia GeForce 1000Nvidia GeForce 1000 MobileNvidia GeForce 1600Nvidia GeForce 1600 MobileNvidia GeForce 2000Nvidia GeForce 2000 MobileNvidia GeForce 3000Nvidia GeForce 3000 MobileNvidia GeForce 400Nvidia GeForce 4000Nvidia GeForce 500Nvidia GeForce 600Nvidia GeForce 600MNvidia GeForce 700Nvidia GeForce 700MNvidia GeForce 800M seriesNvidia GeForce 900Nvidia GeForce 900MNvidia GeForce GTNvidia GeForce GT 1000Nvidia GeForce GTXNvidia GeForce GTX 1000Nvidia GeForce GTX 1000 MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 1600Nvidia GeForce GTX 1600 MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 400Nvidia GeForce GTX 500Nvidia GeForce GTX 600Nvidia GeForce GTX 600 MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 700Nvidia GeForce GTX 700 MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 800 MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 900Nvidia GeForce GTX 900 MobileNvidia GeForce MXNvidia GeForce RTXNvidia GeForce RTX 2000Nvidia GeForce RTX 2000 MobileNvidia GeForce RTX 3000Nvidia GeForce RTX 3000 MobileNvidia GeForce RTX 4000Nvidia GeForce RTX 4000 MobileNvidia GM20BNvidia Quadro NVSNvidia Quadro seriesNvidia TeslaNvidia Tesla V100Nvidia TitanNvidia VoltaPalitPalit GeForce 4000PNYPowerColorQualcommQualcomm AdrenoSamsungSaplosSapphireSapphire Nitro+ RadeonSonySony PlayStationValveVeinedaVivanteXFXYestonZotacZotac GeForce 4000Graphics cards groups

List of benchmarks:

FP32 performance

Equivalence:

AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM Nvidia equivalent

GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland