AMD Radeon R7 250XE vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q


AMD Radeon R7 250XE on Amazon USA
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon R7 250XE on one side and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 640 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0.9 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the laptop segment, it includes 1024 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.2 GHz, its lithography is 12 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.







Specification comparison:


Graphics card AMD Radeon R7 250XE Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Market (main) Desktop Laptop
Release date Q3 2014 Q2 2020
Model number Cape Verde XT N18P-G62
GPU name Cape Verde TU117
Architecture GCN 1.0 Turing
Generation Volcanic Islands R7 200 GeForce 16 Mobile
Lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Transistors 1,500,000,000 4,700,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock 860 MHz 1,035 MHz
GPU boost clock 860 MHz 1,200 MHz
Memory frequency 1,125 MHz 1,250 MHz
Effective memory speed 4.5 Gbps 10 Gbps
Memory size 1 GB 4 GB
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR6
Memory bus 128 bit 128 bit
Memory bandwidth 72.0 GB/s 160.0 GB/s
TDP 80 W 50 W
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 10 16
Shading units (cuda cores) 640 1,024
TMUs 40 64
ROPs 16 32
Cache memory 256 KB 1 MB
Pixel fillrate 13.8 GP/s 38.4 GP/s
Texture fillrate 34.4 GT/s 76.8 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float) 1.1 TFLOPS 2.5 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double) 68.8 GFLOPS 76.8 GFLOPS
Amazon
eBay






Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.


Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.


FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 2,458
AMD Radeon R7 250XE 1,101


The difference is 123%.


Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.


See also:

AMD Radeon R7 250X

Equivalence:

AMD Radeon R7 250XE Nvidia equivalentNvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q AMD equivalent




GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland