AMD Radeon R7 250XE vs Gigabyte AORUS RTX 4090 Xtreme WaterForce

AMD Radeon R7 250XE on Amazon USA
Gigabyte AORUS RTX 4090 Xtreme WaterForce on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon R7 250XE on one side and Gigabyte AORUS RTX 4090 Xtreme WaterForce on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 640 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0.9 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 16384 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.6 GHz, its lithography is 4 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card AMD Radeon R7 250XE Gigabyte AORUS RTX 4090 Xtreme WaterForce
Market (main) Desktop Desktop
Release date Q3 2014 Q3 2022
Model number Cape Verde XT AD102-300-A1,
GPU name Cape Verde AD102
Architecture GCN 1.0 Ada Lovelace
Generation Volcanic Islands R7 200 GeForce 40
Lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Transistors 1,500,000,000 76,300,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
GPU base clock 860 MHz 2,235 MHz
GPU boost clock 860 MHz 2,565 MHz
Memory frequency 1,125 MHz 1,325 MHz
Effective memory speed 4.5 Gbps 21.2 Gbps
Memory size 1 GB 24 GB
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR6X
Memory bus 128 bit 384 bit
Memory bandwidth 72.0 GB/s 1,018.0 GB/s
TDP 80 W 450 W
Suggested PSU250W ATX Power Supply 850W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology - -

1x DVI
1x VGA

3x DisplayPort
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 10 128
Shading units 640 16,384
TMUs 40 512
ROPs 16 176
Cache memory 256 KB 72 MB
Pixel fillrate 13.8 GP/s 451.4 GP/s
Texture fillrate 34.4 GT/s 1,313.0 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float) 1.1 TFLOPS 84.1 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double) 68.8 GFLOPS 1.3 TFLOPS

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Gigabyte AORUS RTX 4090 Xtreme WaterForce 84,050
AMD Radeon R7 250XE 1,101

The difference is 7534%.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

AMD Radeon R7 250X


AMD Radeon R7 250XE Nvidia equivalentGigabyte AORUS RTX 4090 Xtreme WaterForce Nvidia equivalentGigabyte AORUS RTX 4090 Xtreme WaterForce AMD equivalent © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland