AMD Radeon PRO W6500M vs AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

AMD Radeon PRO W6500M on Amazon USA
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon PRO W6500M on one side and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, it has 1024 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.0 GHz, its lithography is 6 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 3840 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.4 GHz, its lithography is 5 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card AMD Radeon PRO W6500M AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Market (main) Laptop Desktop
Release date Q2 2021 Q3 2023
Model number Navi 24 Navi 32 XT,
GPU name Navi 24 Navi 32
Architecture RDNA 2.0 RDNA 3.0
Generation Radeon PRO Mobile W6x00M Navi III RX 7000
Lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Transistors 5,400,000,000 28,100,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x16
GPU base clock 1,512 MHz 1,295 MHz
GPU boost clock 2,040 MHz 2,430 MHz
Memory frequency 2,000 MHz 2,425 MHz
Effective memory speed 16 Gbps 19.4 Gbps
Memory size 4 GB 16 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory bus 64 bit 256 bit
Memory bandwidth 128.0 GB/s 620.8 GB/s
TDP 25 W 263 W
Max display resolution

7680 x 4320

7680 × 4320@60Hz (DP),
3840 x 2160@144Hz (DP),
7680 × 4320@60Hz (HDMI),
3840 x 2160@120Hz (HDMI)
Video decoding H265, HEVC, 4K H264, AV1 H.265, HEVC, H.264 4K
Video encoding H265, HEVC, 4K H264 H.265, HEVC, H.264 4K
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 16 60
Shading units 1,024 3,840
TMUs 64 240
ROPs 32 96
RT cores 16 60
Cache memory 8 MB 64 MB
Pixel fillrate 65.3 GP/s 233.3 GP/s
Texture fillrate 130.6 GT/s 583.2 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half) 8.4 TFLOPS 74.7 TFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float) 4.2 TFLOPS 37.3 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double) 261.1 GFLOPS 1.2 TFLOPS

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT 37,325
AMD Radeon PRO W6500M 4,178

The difference is 793%.

Single-precision floating-point format, also called FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point. FP32 power helps assess the video card's capabilities for generating rendering workloads. Video games use INT32 and FP32 cores to manage calculations with integers and numbers with decimals in order to produce maps, bone matrices on which the vertex shaders will calculate the vertices. Values in single precision format are mainly used in video games and 3D software.


AMD Radeon PRO W6500M Nvidia EquivalentAMD Radeon RX 7800 XT Nvidia Equivalent © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.