AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 on Amazon USA
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 on one side and Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M on the other side. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, it has 4096 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.4 GHz, its lithography is 14 nm. The second is used on the laptop segment, it includes 1536 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.1 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M
Market (main) Laptop Laptop
Release date Q2 2017 Q4 2014
Model number Vega 10 XT 215-0894200 N16E-GX-A1
GPU name Vega 10 GM204
Architecture GCN 5.0 Maxwell 2.0
Generation Radeon Pro Mac Vega Series GeForce 900M
Lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Transistors 12,500,000,000 5,200,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
GPU base clock 1,250 MHz 1,038 MHz
GPU boost clock 1,350 MHz 1,127 MHz
Memory frequency 786 MHz 1,253 MHz
Effective memory speed 1.6 Gbps 5 Gbps
Memory size 16 GB 8 GB
Memory type HBM2 GDDR5
Memory bus 2048 bit 256 bit
Memory bandwidth 402.4 GB/s 160.4 GB/s
TDP 250 W -
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 64 12
Shading units (cuda cores) 4,096 1,536
TMUs 256 96
ROPs 64 64
Cache memory 4 MB 2 MB
Pixel fillrate 86.4 GP/s 72.1 GP/s
Texture fillrate 345.6 GT/s 108.2 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float) 11.1 TFLOPS 3.5 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double) 691.2 GFLOPS 108.2 GFLOPS

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 11,060
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M 3,462

The difference is 219%.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 2-way SLINvidia GeForce GTX 980 MobileNvidia GeForce GTX 980 TiNvidia GeForce GTX 980MX


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 Nvidia equivalentNvidia GeForce GTX 980M AMD equivalent © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland