AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 on Amazon USA
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 on one side and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on the other side. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, it has 4096 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.4 GHz, its lithography is 14 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 768 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.4 GHz, its lithography is 14 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Market (main) Laptop Desktop
Release date Q2 2017 Q4 2016
Model number Vega 10 XT 215-0894200 GP107-400-A1
GPU name Vega 10 GP107
Architecture GCN 5.0 Pascal
Generation Radeon Pro Mac Vega Series GeForce 10
Lithography 14 nm 14 nm
Transistors 12,500,000,000 3,300,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock 1,250 MHz 1,291 MHz
GPU boost clock 1,350 MHz 1,392 MHz
Memory frequency 786 MHz 1,752 MHz
Effective memory speed 1.6 Gbps 7 Gbps
Memory size 16 GB 4 GB
Memory type HBM2 GDDR5
Memory bus 2048 bit 128 bit
Memory bandwidth 402.4 GB/s 112.1 GB/s
TDP 250 W 75 W
Max display resolution


7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),
4096 x 2160@60Hz (HDMI),
2048 x 1536 (VGA)
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 64 6
Shading units (cuda cores) 4,096 768
TMUs 256 48
ROPs 64 32
Cache memory 4 MB 1 MB
Pixel fillrate 86.4 GP/s 44.5 GP/s
Texture fillrate 345.6 GT/s 66.8 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half) 22.1 TFLOPS 33.4 GFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float) 11.1 TFLOPS 2.1 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double) 691.2 GFLOPS 66.8 GFLOPS

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 11,060
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 2,138

The difference is 417%.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-QNvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 Nvidia equivalentNvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti AMD equivalent © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland