AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 on one side and Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on the other side. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, it has 4096 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.4 GHz, its lithography is 14 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, with 24 execution units, it includes 192 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.3 GHz, its lithography is 14 nm+++. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in various benchmarks.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specification comparison:
Graphics card | |
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
| | |
Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) |
| |
Market (main) | |
Laptop |
| | |
Desktop |
| |
Release date | |
Q2 2017 |
| | |
Q1 2021 |
| |
Model number | |
Vega 10 XT 215-0894200 |
| | |
- |
| |
GPU name | |
Vega 10 |
| | |
Rocket Lake GT1 |
| |
Architecture | |
GCN 5.0 |
| | |
Generation 12.1 |
| |
Generation | |
Radeon Pro Mac Vega Series |
| | |
Rocket Lake |
| |
Lithography | |
14 nm |
| | |
14 nm+++ |
| |
Bus interface | |
PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| | |
Ring Bus |
| |
GPU base clock | |
1,250 MHz |
| | |
300 MHz |
| |
GPU boost clock | |
1,350 MHz |
| | |
1,300 MHz |
| |
TDP | |
250 W |
| | |
15 W |
| |
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) | |
64 |
| | |
- |
| |
Execution units | |
- |
| | |
24 |
| |
Shading units | |
4,096 |
| | |
192 |
| |
TMUs | |
256 |
| | |
48 |
| |
ROPs | |
64 |
| | |
8 |
| |
Cache memory | |
4 MB |
| | |
- |
| |
Pixel fillrate | |
86.4 GP/s |
| | |
10.4 GP/s |
| |
Texture fillrate | |
345.6 GT/s |
| | |
15.6 GT/s |
| |
Performance FP16 (half) | |
22.1 TFLOPS |
| | |
998.4 GFLOPS |
| |
Performance FP32 (float) | |
11.1 TFLOPS |
| | |
499.2 GFLOPS |
| |
Amazon | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
eBay | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
The difference is 2116%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.
Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.
See also:
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64XProcessors with the graphics card Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake):
Intel Core i5-11400Intel Core i5-11400TEquivalence:
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 Nvidia equivalentIntel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) Nvidia equivalentIntel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) AMD equivalent
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.