AMD Radeon PRO Vega 56 vs AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

AMD Radeon PRO Vega 56 on Amazon USA
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon PRO Vega 56 on one side and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, it has 3584 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.3 GHz, its lithography is 14 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 3840 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.4 GHz, its lithography is 5 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card AMD Radeon PRO Vega 56 AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Market (main) Laptop Desktop
Release date Q3 2017 Q3 2023
Model number 215-0894216,
Vega 10 XL
Navi 32 XT,
GPU name Vega 10 Navi 32
Architecture GCN 5.0 RDNA 3.0
Generation Radeon PRO Mac Vega Series Navi III RX 7000
Lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Transistors 12,500,000,000 28,100,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
GPU base clock 1,138 MHz 1,295 MHz
GPU boost clock 1,250 MHz 2,430 MHz
Memory frequency 786 MHz 2,425 MHz
Effective memory speed 1.6 Gbps 19.4 Gbps
Memory size 8 GB 16 GB
Memory type HBM2 GDDR6
Memory bus 2048 bit 256 bit
Memory bandwidth 402.4 GB/s 620.8 GB/s
TDP 210 W 263 W

3x DisplayPort

3x DisplayPort
Max display resolution


7680 × 4320@60Hz (DP),
3840 x 2160@144Hz (DP),
7680 × 4320@60Hz (HDMI),
3840 x 2160@120Hz (HDMI)
Video decoding - H.265, HEVC, H.264 4K
Video encoding - H.265, HEVC, H.264 4K
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 56 60
Shading units 3,584 3,840
TMUs 224 240
ROPs 64 96
Cache memory 4 MB 64 MB
Pixel fillrate 80.0 GP/s 233.3 GP/s
Texture fillrate 280.0 GT/s 583.2 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half) 17.9 TFLOPS 74.7 TFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float) 9.0 TFLOPS 37.3 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double) 560 GFLOPS 1.2 TFLOPS

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT 37,325
AMD Radeon PRO Vega 56 8,960

The difference is 317%.

Single-precision floating-point format, also called FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point. FP32 power helps assess the video card's capabilities for generating rendering workloads. Video games use INT32 and FP32 cores to manage calculations with integers and numbers with decimals in order to produce maps, bone matrices on which the vertex shaders will calculate the vertices. Values in single precision format are mainly used in video games and 3D software.


AMD Radeon PRO Vega 56 Nvidia EquivalentAMD Radeon RX 7800 XT Nvidia Equivalent © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.