AMD Radeon HD 8400 Mobile vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

AMD Radeon HD 8400 Mobile on Amazon USA
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon HD 8400 Mobile on one side and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on the other side. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, it has 128 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0.6 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the laptop segment, it includes 1024 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.2 GHz, its lithography is 12 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card AMD Radeon HD 8400 Mobile Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Market (main) Laptop Laptop
Release date Q4 2013 Q2 2020
Model number Radeon HD 8400 Mobile N18P-G62
GPU name Kalindi TU117
Architecture GCN 2.0 Turing
Generation Kabini HD 8000 GeForce 16 Mobile
Lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Transistors 1,178,000,000 4,700,000,000
Bus interface IGP PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock 600 MHz 1,035 MHz
GPU boost clock 600 MHz 1,200 MHz
TDP 25 W 50 W
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 2 16
Shading units (cuda cores) 128 1,024
TMUs 8 64
ROPs 4 32
Cache memory - 1 MB
Pixel fillrate 2.4 GP/s 38.4 GP/s
Texture fillrate 4.8 GT/s 76.8 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float) 153.6 GFLOPS 2.5 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double) 9.6 GFLOPS 76.8 GFLOPS

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 2,458
AMD Radeon HD 8400 Mobile 153.6

The difference is 1500%.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

Processors with the graphics card AMD Radeon HD 8400 Mobile:

AMD A6-5200


AMD Radeon HD 8400 Mobile Nvidia equivalentNvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q AMD equivalent © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland