AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP vs AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP on one side and AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP on the other side. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, it has 320 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.4 GHz, its lithography is 7 nm. The second is used on the laptop segment, it includes 384 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.5 GHz, its lithography is 7 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in various benchmarks.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specifications:
Graphics card | |
AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP |
| | |
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP |
| |
Market | |
Laptop |
| | |
Laptop |
| |
Release date | |
Q1 2020 |
| | |
Q1 2020 |
| |
GPU name | |
Renoir |
| | |
Renoir |
| |
Architecture | |
GCN 5.1 |
| | |
GCN 5.1 |
| |
Generation | |
Vega Mobile |
| | |
Vega Mobile |
| |
Lithography | |
7 nm |
| | |
7 nm |
| |
Transistors | |
9,800,000,000 |
| | |
9,800,000,000 |
| |
Bus interface | |
IGP |
| | |
IGP |
| |
GPU base clock rate | |
400 MHz |
| | |
400 MHz |
| |
GPU max clock rate | |
1.40 GHz |
| | |
1.50 GHz |
| |
TDP | |
15 W |
| | |
15 W |
| |
Shading units | |
320 |
| | |
384 |
| |
TMUs | |
20 |
| | |
24 |
| |
ROPs | |
8 |
| | |
8 |
| |
Compute units | |
5 |
| | |
6 |
| |
Pixel fillrate | |
11.2 GP/s |
| | |
12.0 GP/s |
| |
Texture fillrate | |
28.0 GT/s |
| | |
36.0 GT/s |
| |
Performance FP16 (half) | |
1.8 TFLOPS |
| | |
2.3 TFLOPS |
| |
Performance FP32 (float) | |
896 GFLOPS |
| | |
1.2 TFLOPS |
| |
Performance FP64 (double) | |
56 GFLOPS |
| | |
72 GFLOPS |
| |
Amazon | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
eBay | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
The difference is 29%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.
Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.
Processors with the graphics card AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP:
AMD Ryzen 3 4300UProcessors with the graphics card AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP:
AMD Ryzen 5 4500UEquivalence:
AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP Nvidia equivalentAMD Radeon Graphics 384SP Nvidia equivalent
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.