AMD Radeon 680M vs Intel Arc A730M

AMD Radeon 680M on Amazon USA
Intel Arc A730M on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon 680M on one side and Intel Arc A730M on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, it has 768 shading units, a maximum frequency of 2.2 GHz, its lithography is 6 nm. The second is used on the laptop segment, with 384 execution units, it includes 3072 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.1 GHz, its lithography is 6 nm TSMC N6. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card AMD Radeon 680M Intel Arc A730M
Market (main) Laptop Laptop
Release date Q1 2022 Q2 2022
Model number Radeon 680M ACM-G10
GPU name Rembrandt DG2-512
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Xe HPG
Generation Rembrandt 600 Alchemist Arc 7 Mobile
Lithography 6 nm 6 nm TSMC N6
Transistors 13,100,000,000 21,700,000,000
Bus interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x16
GPU base clock 2,000 MHz 1,100 MHz
GPU boost clock 2,200 MHz 1,100 MHz
TDP 50 W 80 W
Max display resolution

3840 x 2160@60Hz (DP),
3440 x 1440@144Hz (DP),
2560 x 1440@180Hz (DP),
1920 x 1080@240Hz (DP)

4096 x 2160@60Hz (HDMI),
7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),
5120 x 2880@60Hz (eDP)
Video decoding H.265 1080p240 H.264, H.265, HEVC, AV1, VP9
Video encoding H.265 2160p51 H.264, H.265, HEVC, AV1
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) 12 24
Execution units - 384
Shading units 768 3,072
TMUs 48 192
ROPs 32 96
RT cores 12 24
Cache memory 2 MB 12 MB
Pixel fillrate 70.4 GP/s 105.6 GP/s
Texture fillrate 105.6 GT/s 211.2 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half) 6.5 TFLOPS 13.5 TFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float) 3.4 TFLOPS 6.8 TFLOPS

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Intel Arc A730M 6,758
AMD Radeon 680M 3,379.2

The difference is 100%.

Single-precision floating-point format, also called FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point. FP32 power helps assess the video card's capabilities for generating rendering workloads. Video games use INT32 and FP32 cores to manage calculations with integers and numbers with decimals in order to produce maps, bone matrices on which the vertex shaders will calculate the vertices. Values in single precision format are mainly used in video games and 3D software.

Processors with the graphics card AMD Radeon 680M:

AMD Ryzen 7 6800HAMD Ryzen 7 6800HSAMD Ryzen 7 6800UAMD Ryzen 7 6810UAMD Ryzen 7 7735HAMD Ryzen 7 7735HSAMD Ryzen 7 7735UAMD Ryzen 7 7736UAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HSAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850UAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860ZAMD Ryzen 9 6900HSAMD Ryzen 9 6900HXAMD Ryzen 9 6980HSAMD Ryzen 9 6980HXAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS


AMD Radeon 680M Nvidia EquivalentIntel Arc A730M Nvidia EquivalentIntel Arc A730M AMD Equivalent © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.